ABSTRACT
Introduction In Italy a Covid-19 pandemic pattern was observed, characterized by several waves, with an excess total mortality of 178000 deaths. Alessandria, Italy is the Piedmont province with the highest proportion of mortality from Covid-19 in the first 4 months of 2020, compared to the rest of the region. Objectives To analyze mortality in patients hospitalized for Covid-19 in the Alessandria Hospital (AO AL), considering the first 3 waves. Materials and methods Subjects aged ≥18 with a diagnosis of Covid-19 admitted to the AO AL in the first 50 days of the first 3 waves were included. The first wave started on 24 February 2020 (first day of available data by the Ministry of Health), the second wave on 14 September 2020 (first day of the 2020/21 school year), the third wave on 15 February 2021 (peak of cases detected by the Italian College of Health). The causes of death were obtained from the National Institute of Statistics death cards and codified according to the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, classification. Results We included 825 subjects (median age: 73 years;male prevalence: 60.7%). The subjects hospitalized in the first wave were 464, in the second wave 255, in the third wave 106. A total of 309 subjects died (37.5%), of which 218 in the first wave (70.6%), 69 in the second wave (22.3%), 22 in the third wave (7.1%). The most frequent causes of death were “Covid-19 pneumonia” (61.5%) and “respiratory distress syndrome” (19.4%). Death occurred after hospital discharge in 40% of cases. 6 months after admission, the survival rate was 53% among patients of the first wave, 73% and 78% for those of the second and third wave. Patients hospitalized in the first and second waves showed a greater risk of death compared to patients of the third wave (HR = 2.8;95% CI 1.8-4.4 and HR = 1.4;95% CI 0.8-2.2). Conclusions Data showed a difference in mortality between the 3 waves with a statistically significant variation between the first and third waves. Key messages • Data showed a difference in mortality between the 3 waves. • Data showed a statistically significant variation in mortality between the first and third waves.
ABSTRACT
Background: Immunogenicity and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been widely investigated in patients (pts) with cancer. However, their effectiveness against Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the additional protective effect of a booster dose in this population are yet to be defined. Methods: Using OnCovid study data (NCT04393974), a European registry enrolling consecutive pts with cancer and COVID-19, we evaluated morbidity and 14 days case fatality rates (CFR14) from COVID-19 in pts who were unvaccinated, vaccinated (either partially/full vaccinated but not boosted) and those who had received a third dose. Analyses were restricted to pts diagnosed between 17/11/2021 (first breakthrough infection in a boosted pt) and the 31/01/2022. Pts with unknown vaccination status were excluded. Results: By the data lock of 22/02/2022, out of 3820 consecutive pts from 36 institutions, 415 pts from 3 countries (UK, Spain, Italy) were eligible for analysis. Among them, 51 (12.3%) were unvaccinated, 178 (42.9%) were vaccinated and 186 (44.8%) were boosted. Among vaccinated pts, 26 (14.6%) were partially vaccinated (1 dose). Pts with haematological malignancies had more likely received a booster dose prior to infection (25.4% vs 13.6% and 11.8%, p = 0.02). We found no other associations between vaccination status and pts' characteristics including sex, age, comorbidities, smoking history, tumour stage, tumour status and receipt of systemic anticancer therapy. Compared to unvaccinated pts, boosted and vaccinated pts achieved improved CFR14 (6.8% and 7.0% vs 22.4%, p = 0.01), COVID-19-related hospitalization rates (26.1% and 20.6% vs 41.2%, p = 0.01) and COVID-19-related complications rates (14.5% and 15.7% vs 31.4%). Using multivariable Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) models adjusted for sex, comorbidities, tumour status and country of origin we confirmed that boosted (OR 0.21, 95%CI: 0.05-0.89) and vaccinated pts (OR 0.19, 95%CI: 0.04-0.81) achieved improved CFR14 compared to unvaccinated pts, whilst a significantly reduced risk of COVID-19 complications (OR 0.26, 95%CI: 0.07-0.93) was reported for vaccinated pts only. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines protect from COVID-19 morbidity and mortality in pts with cancer. Accounting for the enrichment of haematologic pts in the boosted group, the observation of comparable mortality outcomes between boosted and vaccinated pts is reassuring and suggests boosting to be associated with reduced mortality in more vulnerable subjects, despite evidence of adverse features in this group.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: In a context of COVID-19 vaccine shortages, this study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of receiving one dose of Gam-COVID-Vac rAd26 followed by a second COVID-19 vaccine dose of either Gam-COVID-Vac rAd5, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BBIBP-CorV in a cohort of older adults. Study design: Single-centre, randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial. Methods: Adults aged ≥65 years who had received one dose of Gam-COVID-Vac rAd26 were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a second-dose COVID-19 vaccination of either Gam-COVID-Vac rAd5, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BBIBP-CorV. The primary outcome was the assessment of the humoral immune response to vaccination (i.e. antibody titres of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein at 28 days after second-dose vaccination). In addition, neutralising antibody titres at day 28 for the three schedules were measured. Results: Of 85 participants who were enrolled in the study between 26 and July 30, 2021, 31 individuals were randomised to receive Gam-COVID-Vac rAd5, 27 to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and 27 to BBIBP-CorV. The mean age of participants was 68.2 years (SD 2.9) and 49 (57.6%) were female. Participants who received Gam-COVID-Vac rAd5 and ChAdOx1 nCoV1-19 showed significantly increased anti-S titres at 28 days after second-dose vaccination, but this magnitude of difference was not observed for those who received BBIBP-CorV. The ratio between the geometric mean at day 28 and baseline within each group was 11.8 (6.98-19.89) among patients assigned to Gam-COVID-Vac rAd26/rAd5, 4.81 (2.14-10.81) for the rAd26/ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group and 1.53 (0.74-3.20) for the rAd26/BBIBP-CorV group. All of the schedules were shown to be safe. Conclusions: The findings in this study contribute to the scarce information published on the safety and immunogenicity of Gam-COVID-Vac heterologous regimens and will help the development of guidelines and vaccine programme management.